Hi, I'm Kaziuk.
And below is my mathematical argument, which I carried out in accordance with special theory of relativity, and which shows that Albert Einstein says in special theory of relativity that 4 = 7.
Between 3 September 2024 and 10 october 2024 I have sent 1,000 emails to professors of physics with the link to my argument. The list of professors of physics to whom I have sent my email along with a note on whether I received a response from him/her and what it was, is here.
Kaziuk's Mathematical Argument
Polska wersja
Here is another version of my argument, namely Kaziuk's Sequence.
This is formula for the ralativistic kinetic energy:
Now imagine a space station somewhere in intergalactic space that from its point of view is inertial frame of reference. On this station there is an observer and 3 rockets: A, B, and C.
Pic.1
All rockets are the same, thus they have the same rest mass of x.
Pic.2
Now the observer applies to rocket A the force resulting from the annihilation of 1 bucket with coal. As a result, rocket A accelerated to the speed of 0.866 the speed of light relative to the station.
Pic.3
So from the point of view of the observer, for rocket A the gamma factor is 2.
Pic.4
So from the point of view of the observer, relativistic kinetic energy of rocket A is:
Pic.5
Now the observer applies to rocket B the force resulting from the annihilation of 3 buckets with coal. As a result, the relativistic kinetic energy of rocket B is 3 times greater than that of rocket A, and it is:
Pic.6
So from the point of view of the observer, for rocket B the gamma factor is 4.
Pic.7
Thus, from the point of view of the observer, the speed of rocket B is 0.9682c.
Pic.8
Now the observer attached to rocket C the bucket with coal.
Pic.9
The bucket with coal has the rest mass the same as is the rest mass of each rocket.
Pic.10
That's why the rest mass of the set, i.e. rocket C and the bucket with coal, is 2x.
Pic.11
Now the observer applies to the set the force resulting from the annihilation of 2 buckets with coal. And since the force applied to rocket A, which was resulting from the annihilation of 1 bucket of coal, resulted in the gamma factor for rocket A of 2, then the force applied to the set, which was resulting from the annihilation of 2 buckets of coal, also resulted in the gamma factor for the set of:
Pic.12
Thus, the speed of the set relative to the station is 0.866c.
Pic.13
But from the point of view of the set, the set is at rest and the space station is in motion at the speed of 0.866c.
Pic.14
And now a tiny bottle cap has fallen out of rocket C.
Pic.15
Now, to rocket C, which from its point of view is inertial frame of reference, is automatically applied the force resulting from the annihilation of the bucket with coal attached to it. As a result, rocket C flies relative to the cap at the speed of 0.866c (because this was the speed at which rocket A flew relative to the station after the force resulting from the annihilation of 1 bucket with coal was applied to it).
Pic.16
Since the cap has the speed relative to the station of 0.866c (because such was the speed of the set) and rocket C has the same speed relative to the cap, then rocket C has the speed of 0.9897c relative to the station.
Pic.17
Therefore, from the point of view of the observer, for rocket C the gamma factor is about 7.
Pic.18
So after the annihilation of 3 buckets with coal, belonging to the observer, the gamma factor for rocket B from the observer's point of view is 4,
Pic.19
and after the annihilation of 3 other buckets of coal, belonging to the observer, the gamma factor for rocket C from the observer's point of view is about 7.
Pic.20
Therefore, Albert Einstein says in special theory of relativity
that
Pic.21
And here is my letter to the public.
Kaziuk von Märchendorf
mail: kaziukvonmaerchendorf@gmail.com
P.S. If you have something to say about my argument, do it on my Facebook page Einstein miał rację (Einstein was right).
(30 May 2024)