Hi, I'm Kaziuk.
Here is Kaziuk's Sequence showing that in Einstein's special theory of relativity 1 * 3 = about 6.
And under the asterisks is the title page of my book with the Introduction (in my poor translation); the book is not published yet – I'm waiting for an offer from some cosmic publisher.
****************************************
Kaziuk von Märchendorf
COSMOCOMP
Volume 1
Introduction
My book isn't for humans because humans have apish mind inherited from their apish ancestors.
My book is for visitors from outer space — because only visitors from outer space have sublime mind.
So, if you, the reader, are visitor from outer space, it is you I'm addressing in my book.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's imagine a car driving on a highway.
But besides our car, there are other cars driving there too; some are going faster, some at the same speed, and some slower, but all are driving in the same direction.
Now imagine, visitor from outer space, that in our car, in the backseat, there's a child, looking out the rear window, that has got it into his head that the car, it's in, is stationary.
And it so happens that the cars behind our car, which are actually going slower than our car, are driving in this child's dilusion in the opposite direction and backwards, to boot.
Now imagine human medieval professors looking at the night sky.
Human medieval professors got it into their heads that the Earth was stationary.
And it was so that the planets, which in reality all moved in the same direction all the time, occasionally moved backwards in this DELUSION of human medieval professors.
"Backwards movement [of planets] is actually an illusion created by our viewpoint here on Earth. It’s created by the different speeds at which the planets orbit the Sun." – text on the website of Science Focus.
And for 1,000 years human medieval professors failed to realize that what they were observing was illusion, but instead they practiced some NONSENSICAL entities behind these pseudoretrograde planetary motions.
"Ptolemy assumed that the planets revolved around small circles called epicycles at a uniform rate while the centre of the epicyclic circle orbited Earth on a large circle called a deferent. (...) His scheme was adopted [in Middle Ages] as absolute dogma." – text from Encyclopedia Britannica.
And even when visitor from outer space Nicolaus Copernicus demonstrated that the Earth wasn't stationary but orbited the Sun along with the other planets, human medieval professors didn't get it.
How is this possible?
It's because medieval human professors had apish mind inherited from their apish ancestors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now imagine, visitor from outer space, an internal combustion engine but one whose components are all transparent – so that you can see everything that happens inside while the engine is running.
And now imagine the reflection of this three-dimensional engine in the two-dimensional surface of a mirror.
The mirror also shows what's happening inside the running engine but because this image is flattened, the processes occurring in the engine are superimposed on one another, as a result, it all forms some kind of bizarre nonsense pulp – of course, someone with the three-dimensional imagination can easily imbue this flat image seen in the mirror with three dimensions and then everything makes sense.
But now imagine that on the two-dimensional surface of the mirror lives a two-dimensional flatman with the two-dimensional imagination – let's call him Albert.
Albert Oneflatman observes what happens on the surface of the mirror which Albert Oneflatman considers the entire universe.
And Albert Oneflatman observes that some bizzare processes are occurring in his universe.
Albert Oneflatman explores these bizzare processes.
And since Albert Oneflatman is clever within his two-dimensionality, he organized these bizarre processes in his own flat/two-dimensional way.
But to organize these bizarre processes occurring in two dimensions, Albert Oneflatman postulated the existence of various entities in this two-dimensionality which in reality don't exist but are merely invented by him.
These entities invented by Albert Oneflatman lead to various paradoxes in two dimensions, but Albert Oneflatman resolved these paradoxes by postulating the existence of other entities in two dimensions – these entities invented by Albert Oneflatman are NONSENSICAL, but what flatman would care about that?
And now Albert Oneflatman can correctly calculate this or that happening on the two-dimensional surface of the mirror or correctly predict this or that; or at least that's what Albert Oneflatman thinks.
And now all flatmen living on the surface of the mirror think that Albert Oneflatman has solved the mystery of how the universe works and recognize him as the greatest genius of all time.
But that what Albert Oneflatman practices has nothing to do with the true engine and is merely a DELUSION.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The cosmology practiced by human professors of physics, with Albert Einstein at the lead, has nothing to do with the true Universe, but is merely a DELUSION.
The proof of this is my simple argument consisting of six sentences which I have called Kaziuk's Sequence; I posted Kaziuk's Sequence on my website www.cosmocomp.com
But not only does Kaziuk's Sequence show that what human professors of physics practice has nothing to do with the true Universe, it is shown also by the NONSENSE of what they practice.
I'll give a few examples:
1.
Most people think that time travel involves getting into a time machine and then appearing in a past that NO LONGER EXISTS or in a future that IS YET TO EXIST.
That's a complete misconception.
Well, since, according to human professors of physics, time is the dimension — the fourth dimension that is essentially no different from the three spatial dimensions because it's just as Euclidean as spatial dimensions are — then time and space form Euclidean four-dimensional space-time.
"One is using Euclidean space-times in which the time direction is on the same footing as directions in space." – human professor of physics Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time.
And in this space-time, which is practiced by human professors of physics, just as all space exists SIMULTANEOUSLY in three dimensions, so all times from the beginning of the Universe to its end exist SIMULTANEOUSLY in the fourth dimension.
"Physicists proposed a reading of Einstein’s theory of relativity, known as the 'growing block universe', which is as follows: it postulates considering space-time as a fully deployed structure within which all events, whether past, present or future, coexist. They would have exactly the same reality, in the same way as all the various towns in France coexist at the same time in space, while being located in different places: while I am in Saclay, Grenoble and Bordeaux exist just as much, the only difference between the three towns being that Saclay is where I am present, whereas this is not the case of Grenoble or Bordeaux, at least at the time I am writing these lines. In short, space-time would contain the entire history of reality, with each past, present or future event occupying a clearly determined place in it, from the very beginning and for ever. The past would therefore still exist, just as the future already exists, but somewhere other than where we are now present." – Etienne Klein, human physicist and head of the Physical Sciences Research Laboratory (Institute of Research into the Fundamental Laws of the Universe - CEA)
Thus, human professors of physics, believing that space-time exists, believe that the world of the dinosaurs, for example, EXISTS just like our world only in a different place of the fourth dimension of space-time.
And for human professors of physics, the only question is whether it's possible to travel in the fourth temporal dimension of space-time just as it's in the three spatial dimensions of space-time.
Of course, many human professors of physics believe it's possible because it's just a matter of technology, and during the construction of a time machine, they've already packed for a Mesozoic safari.
And now, visitor from outer space, let's board the prototype time machine constructed by human professors of physics and travel through the fourth dimension of space-time to the Roman Empire.
Here in the Roman Empire, haruspicy — that is, predicting the future based on the appearance of a sheep's liver — is elevated to the rank of the most important of sciences, emperors found academies where the secrets of haruspicy are explored and haruspices constitute the intellectual elite.
And now, after returning from our trip to the fourth dimension of space-time, I ask a question: which is more NONSENSICAL, haruspicy practiced by ancient haruspices or space-time practiced by contemporary professors of physics?
I'm betting on space-time.
And now imagine yet that in court a witness, or a defendant, testifies – in accordance with what human professors of physics claim – that a comet is JUST falling on dinosaurs in the Yucatan, only in the fourth dimension of space-time; surely any judge would send such an individual for a compulsory psychiatric examination.
But it doesn't occur to human professors of physics that what they practice is so NONSENSICAL that it cannot be true.
How is this possible?
It's because human professors of physics have the same apish mind as their medieval ancestors.
2.
A pendulum clock runs slower on the Moon than on Earth, but does that mean time passes slower on the Moon?
Of course not, it's just that the force of gravity on the Moon is weaker than on Earth.
And the same is true for an atomic clock in a flying rocket – it runs slower, but that doesn't mean time passes slower in the rocket, only that the process that makes it run, occurs slower.
However, billions of people believe that time passes slower in flying rocket; and after the rocket returns to Earth, the twin cosmonaut will be younger than the twin remaining on Earth.
How is it possible that billions of people believe in such NONSENSE?
It's because human professors of physics have been proclaiming such a fudge for over a hundred years.
"In Einstein's special theory of relativity, there is no such thing as 'time' in the singular. Time passes differently for different observers, depending on the observers' motion. The prime example is that of the two hypothetical twins: One of them stays at home, on Earth. The other journeys into space in an ultra-fast rocket, nearly as fast as the speed of light, before returning home. Afterwards, when the twins are reunited on Earth, the travelling twin is markedly younger, compared to his stay-at-home sibling." – www.einstein-online.info
Why does human professors of physics proclaim such a fudge?
It's because human professors of physics have the same apish mind as their medieval ancestors.
3.
Special theory of relativity says that when a rocket returns to Earth from a distant planet, then from the astronaut's point of view, the rocket isn't flying, only the Earth is flying to the rocket – which is NONSENSE in itself, because the force was applied to the rocket, when it took off, not to Earth.
But since from the astronaut's point of view, the Earth is flying, then after the Earth reaches the rocket, the twin remaining on Earth should be younger than the astronaut twin.
So, from special theory of relativity it follows that for the twin on Earth, the astronaut twin is younger and for the astronaut twin, the twin on Earth is younger.
This absurdity, which resuts from special theory of relativity, and which is called the twin paradox, human professors of physics solve as follows:
When the rocket taking off from the distant planet accelerated, time on Earth FLOWED FASTER than in the rocket, so faster that when the rocket stopped accelerating, there was already the DISTANT FUTURE on Earth compared to the present in the rocket; as a result, although from the astronaut's point of view, the Earth was flying and time on it FLOWED SLOWER than in the rocket, after the rocket landed on Earth, overall less time had passed in the rocket than on Earth; therefore, the astronaut is younger than his twin remaining on Earth, not the other way around.
I found out about this after I made a YouTube video on my channel Kaziuk von Märchendorf about my invented version of this absurdity stemming from special theory of relativity – then I received several comments on physics forums from human physicists with this very explanation; and before that, I had no idea that human professors of physics practiced something like that, even though I'd read a hundred+ books written by human professors of physics.
But it doesn't surprise me at all that human professors of physics don't flaunt it publicly, because it's so NONSENSICAL that if someone said something like that to a psychiatrist, he/she wouldn't leave the lunatic asylum for the rest of his/her live.
However, human professors of physics show no reflection whatsoever.
How is this possible?
It's because human professors of physics have the same apish mind as their medieval ancestors.
4.
In his special theory of relativity, human Albert Einstein postulates not only that from the astronaut's point of view, the rocket stays still and the distant planet and Earth are in flight, but also that for the astronaut, the distance between the planet and Earth shortens.
"The Earth-bound observer measures the proper distance between the Earth and the Alpha Centauri. The astronaut observes a length contraction [that's the contraction of the distance between the Earth and the Alpha Centauri], since the Earth and the Alpha Centauri move relative to her ship." – text from the webside of Wright State University.
But why would the space between the planet and Earth — which, according to human relativistic physics, isn't even in relativistic motion but only the planet and Earth are in relativistic motion within the space — shorten? what is the mechanism of action of this extraordinary phenomenon?
However you, visitor from outer space, won't learn this from special theory of relativity because human Albert Einstein doesn't provide mechanism of action for this phenomenon, nor for any other phenomenon he postulated.
So how does human Albert Einstein know that space shortens?
Because that's what human Albert Einstein concluded from other postulates of human Albert Einstein.
And what is the difference between belief in these miracles postulated by prophet Albert and belief in the immaculate conception made by ghost?
None.
However, human professors of physics fail to see this NONSENSE at all.
How is this possible?
It's because human professors of physics have the same apish mind as their medieval ancestors.
5.
Cow gives milk regardless of whether it chews grass at a constant speed or faster and faster.
This shows that the phenomenon of giving milk by cow isn't a result of how cow chews grass.
Now, let's take the postulate of the village idiot from my village:
'When cow chews grass at a constant speed, it gives milk.'
Well, that seems to be correct, but since cow also gives milk when it chews grass faster and faster, then as a description of the phenomenon of giving milk by cow, the village idiot's postulate is nonsensical.
Now, let's take a train whose locomotive has its headlight on.
For the driver, the light from the headlight always moves away from the locomotive at the same manner, regardless of whether the train is stationary on the platform, traveling at a constant speed, or accelerating.
And this shows that the behavior of light from the locomotive's headlight doesn't depend on the behavior of the train.
Now let's take another postulate of prophet Albert:
'The speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of reference.'
Well, that seems to be correct, but since light behaves the same way also when the train accelerates, then as a description of the phenomenon of the constant speed of light, the postulate of prophet Albert is as NONSENSICAL as the village idiot's postulate as a description of the phenomenon of giving milk by cow.
However, human professors of physics think that Albert Einstein was a genius and explained why the speed of light is constant.
"It was the young Einstein's genius to explain just WHY the speed of light is constant." – www.physicsoftheuniverse.com
And that's like thinking that village idiot is a genius and explained why cow gives milk.
But human professors of physics are happy because Albert Einstein has solved for them the mystery of how the universe works.
How is this possible?
It's because human professors of physics have the same apish mind as their medieval ancestors.
6.
On Quora, I asked the following question:
"Why does body's mass increase twice EXACTLY at the speed of 86.6% c, and four times EXACTLY at the speed of 96.82% c? what is the mechanism of action of this phenomenon?"
There were a dozen or so answers from human physicists.
And basically all of these answers boiled down to this: 'because that's what the Lorentz formula says.'
Which is NONSENSICAL and demonstrates the complete mental inertia of these human physicists – because even my she-goat understands that the formula itself isn't the mechanism of action but there's some mechanism of action behind this formula that causes these values to be EXACTLY as they are.
And finally, the answer was as follows:
"I suspect that a definitive answer to this question won't be available for a long time yet."
And this answer illustrates the knowledge of human professors of physics of the mechanism of action of this phenomenon – which is none.
And why it's none?
Because it cannot be explained based on special theory of relativity; especially since prophet Albert doesn't present any mechanisms of action but only postulates.
As a result, human professors of physics don't even try to understand what this mechanism of action is, they simply assume that it is as it is.
And human professors of physics are very pleased with themselves.
How is this possible?
It's because human professors of physics have the same apish mind as their medieval ancestors.
7.
Human Albert Einstein's theory of gravity works – or at least that's what human professors of physics believe.
Except that human Albert Einstein's theory of gravity has nothing to do with quantum physics.
And since human professors of physics believe quantum physics is true, then human Albert Einstein's theory of gravity cannot be true – something human professors of physics say directly.
And since quantum gravity doesn't work at all, human professors of physics have no idea what actually caused the apple to fall on Newton's head.
As a result, having no idea how gravity works, human professors of physics, with Albert Einstein at the lead, claim that gravity can increase infinitely.
That's why human professors of physics believe that space is riddled with holes like Swiss cheese and there are wormholes that lead to other universes.
"The complete Schwarzschild geometry consists of a black hole, a white hole, and two Universes connected at their horizons by a wormhole." – text on the website of University of Colorado.
But even to my she-goat this is NONSENSICAL.
However, to human professors of physics this is the truest truth.
"Schwarzschild wormholes certainly exist as exact solutions of Einstein’s equations." – text on the website of University of Colorado.
How is this possible?
It's because human professors of physics have the same apish mind as their medieval ancestors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm an autistic mind that perceives the Universe completely differently than human professors of physics.
I'm like the condor soaring high above my village.
The condor, soaring high above my village, sees that the mill in my village is surrounded by the meadow and the river running through it powers the mill wheel. Curious about what's inside the mill, the condor perched on the mill window which is high under the mill roof. The condor saw that mill ants were locked inside the mill.
The mill ants explore all the mill gears in the mill – what these gears are, which way they turn, what teeth they have and what these teeth are made of. The mill ants pore over it all. And the mill ants think that once they explore the last gear tooth, the last spacer and the last latch they will understand the essence of the universe – which the mill ants consider the interior of the mill to be. And when asked why these gears are turning at all, the mill ants reply that it's because of dark energy. However, the mill ants calculated that dark energy isn't enough, so they proclaim that dark matter also exists. The mill ants also proclaim that there's a hole in the mill's roof, but it's black, and everything there is singular and infinite; and if one falls into that black hole in the roof, one will fall out in the basement; unless in another mill, of course. And when asked what's outside the mill, the mill ants reply that there's nothingness there.
The condor, hearing what the mill ants were saying, was stunned. Finally, he whistled on its feathers and then began telling the mill ants about the entire world beyond the mill. But the mill ants didn't get any of it, they thought the condor was crazy, and they again started solving mill paradoxes with mill absurdities and mill absurdities with mill dark powers.
And human professors of physics are like mill ants locked in the mill.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I'll quote an excerpt from the NBC News website:
"Experts including Neil Degrasse Tyson and Elon Musk have proposed that we might be living within a simulation."
The term 'simulation' is key here.
It's because the term 'simulation' means that there exists some non-virtual/real world of which the virtual world we live in is a simulation.
And this is a completely false idea.
It's because no non-virtual world exists.
Yes, we live in a virtual world, but this is the REAL world, because there can be no other in the Universe; and if other universes exist, then the world in each of them is just as virtual as our world in our Universe.
This is the essence of the Universe(s).
And just as, in addition to the virtual world happening on a computer monitor screen, a computer also has a computer program, the virtual world of the Universe is not all that exists in the Universe – because the Universe also has a "computer program."
Such is the essence of the Universe(s).
Metaphorically speaking:
- the virtual world of the Universe is the entire mill in my village, including what is on the mill's outer wall and roof, but excluding the mill wheel,
- what human professors of physics call space, and what they consider to be the entire Universe, is the interior of the mill in my village,
- the "computer program" of the Universe is what is outside the mill in my village, including the mill wheel,
- and the Universe is my village.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In my book, I will tell you, visitor from outer space, what is written in the "computer program" of the Universe and how it manifests in the virtual world of the Universe.
In my description of the Universe, every phenomenon has a mechanism of action and all these mechanisms of action result from one another.
My description of the Universe is like a puzzle picture, where all the pieces fit together perfectly.
I will also add that all the drawings I made by hand and without the aid of any drawing instruments – this is to emphasize how OBVIOUS the Universe is when it is viewed when "soaring high above my village."
And by way of introduction, yet just this:
The virtual world of the Universe, I have called VIRTUALVERSUM.
The "computer program" of the Universe, I have called MATHEMUM.
And the whole, that's the Universe, I have called COSMOCOMP.
Kaziuk von Märchendorf
mail: kaziukvonmaerchendorf@gmail.com
Facebook: Wszechświat według Kaziuka