Hi, I'm Kaziuk.
And bellow is my article titled "Why Is E Equal To c2 * m And Not m * c2."
Why Is E Equal To c2 * m And Not m * c2
Introduction
My article is a shortened and simplified version of my theory of what the Universe is like and how it works – it is a condensation aimed at showing in the simplest possible way what it is all about.
In my description of the Universe, everything results from something, and everything has some mechanism of action connected with everything else – that is why my description of the Universe is like a picture made of puzzle pieces, and all the puzzle pieces fit together perfectly.
And my description of the Universe has as much in common with the universe practiced by professors of physics as the Copernican model has with the Ptolemaic model practiced by medieval professors.
And why haven't I published my theory in some scientific journal?
Because I'm not a scientist – I'm an autistic mind that perceives reality completely differently than naked apes calling themselves professors of physics.
Besides, the chance that some scientific journal would publish my theory in a situation where it shows that Newton and Einstein were telling nonsense born of their limited minds is zero.
Unless I'm wrong. But then such a journal has to report to me.
Now fasten your seat belt, because the ride will be rough and without a brake.
And here is my simple argument showing that what professors of physics say about the universe is just as much cosmic bullshit as what medieval professors said.
1st Sharp Turn
The true unit of speed c is not about 300,000 km/s, but the length overcame at the same rate but in the shortest possible time – and such a time exists in the Universe, because nothing can divide itself endlessly.
And when there is a point in such motion, then speed c is a longitudinal/stringly impulse lasting as long as the shortest time interval.
And when this string impulse occurs over and over in one place and is squared, then it is energy:
c2
that's it is
indivisible portion of energy inextricably linked to the smallest portion of matter.
What this indivisible energy is, what exactly its structure is, and how it hides from professors of physics, I described in my brochure "COSMOCOMP 1st Brochure" which I posted on Wattpad.
Here I'll add that matter itself is not energy – I described what matter is in my brochure – energy is this c2 associated with every smallest portion of matter.
And since there are other types of energies in the Universe with the value c2, I am writing this particular energy in this article as:
c2red
2nd Sharp Turn
Space is made up of fields – and what the structure of the spatial field is and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
The spatial field is energy.
The center of the spatial field is c2 energy; in this article I write it as c2green.
And the entire spatial field is c3green energy.
Wherein:
c3 = c2 * KAZIUK
How exactly it works and what it results from, I described in my brochure. From my brochure you will also learn how to calculate the numerical value, which I called KAZIUK.
Energy that is the spatial field, i.e. c3green energy, has basically the same structure as c2red energy, because c2red energy is also the field. But these energies do not pass into each other – and what this results from, I described in my brochure; in my brochure, for distinction, c3green energies are marked with green, and c2red energies with red.
And now:
- every smallest portion of matter, that's elementary particle of matter, is in the center of some spatial field,
- because the center of the spatial field is energy, then the elementary particle of matter – in short the particle – has mass.
And if the mass of the particle were the energy that is the center of the spatial field, then the mass of the particle would be energy. But it is not. It is so that the energy that is the center of the spatial field MAKES the particle have mass – and how exactly this works and what results from, I described in my brochure.
So what is mass if it is not energy?
The mass of the particle is the measure of the "red" energy associated with this particle, because the center of the spatial field is the same c2 energy, only "green" – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
The set of "red" c2red energies is E.
So:
E = c2 * m
And in this article:
Ered = c2red * m
3rd Sharp Turn
When a particle is in motion in space, then with the entire inventory, i.e. with the spatial field in the center of which it is and with the c2red energy assigned to this particle – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And when the spatial field is in motion, then it is smaller – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And when the spatial field is smaller, it has a greater "density," and thus the center of the spatial field has a greater "density" – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And when the center of the spatial field has a greater "density" – with the same size which is constant – then it is a greater energy than c2.
And when the center of the spatial field is a greater energy than c2, then the particle has a correspondingly greater mass.
And then this excess mass of the particle is the measure of the energy pushing this whole set through space – that is, the spatial field, the particle, and c2red energy assigned to it – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure. In my brochure I also described what causes movement in space, and what mechanism causes the increase in pushing energy not to translate proportionally into an increase in the speed of the set, and thus what is the mechanism of action of the fact that, for example, the two-fold increase in the mass of a particle occurs at the speed of 0.866c and the four-fold increase at the speed of 0.9682c – and a metaphorical description of this very interesting phenomenon, I presented here.
So when a particle in motion has, for example, twice as much mass, this excess mass reveals that the value of the pushing energy is 1c2pink, because 2 – 1 = 1.
And when a particle in motion has, for example, 4 times as much mass, this excess mass reveals that the value of the pushing energy is 3c2pink, because 4 – 1 = 3.
However, the smallest portion of the pushing energy is cpink – and how the increasing amount of energies cpink turns into c2pink, I described in my brochure.
Here I'll reveal that:
c2 = c * KAZIUK
But this is a simplified version, because this relationship is a bit more complex – which I described in my brochure.
I'll also add that in my brochure the pushing energy is marked with the color pink – hence the pink.
And what is very important, "pink" energy, unlike "green" and "red" energy, is not the field.
But since a particle with the entire inventory is in motion in space because of the "pink" energy, then
motion in space, whatever it is, is not relative.
I'll also mention that the amount of "pink" energy doesn't determine whether a body is in motion or at what speed, because it can act from many directions at the same time – as is in the case of a car pushed by one twin from behind and the other from the front, and as a result the car stands still. In fact, movement and speed are determined by the tilt of the "joystick" – and what this "joystick" is, I described in my brochure.
Coming off this turn, I'll add that movement in space is not the force in itself. Movement in space is only a SIDE EFFECT of acting of the "pink" energy.
4th Sharp Turn
A sphere with a radius twice as large has 8 times the volume but only 4 times the surface. So if we take a sphere with a volume of 8x, and evenly stuck 8 red pins into its surface corresponding to its volume, then in the case of a sphere with the radius twice as large there will be 8 * 8 = 64 red pins and the surface will be 4 times larger, so now the red pins are twice as densely stuck into the surface, because: 64 (pins) / 4 (times the surface) = 16 (pins on the same surface area, not 8 as in the first case), and 16 / 8 = 2.
And now I will show you how this matters:
Let's take planet A at the surface of which the force of gravity is x. Now let's take planet B, which has twice the radius and the same density (in reality such a planet couldn't exist, but my example is just a model illustration). At the surface of planet B, the force of gravity is 2x – because having 8 times the volume and 4 times the surface area, every square centimeter of the surface of planet B has 2 times more “red pins” “stuck” than planet A.
And if planet B were to shrink in some magical way to the same size as planet A, it would have 4 times less surface area than it did originally, so in this situation, the force of gravity at its surface would be 4 times greater than it did originally – because every square centimeter of its surface would have 4 times more “red pins” than it did originally.
And if planet B were to shrink in some magical way by another half radius, its surface would decrease by another 4 times, and then the force of gravity at its surface would be 16 times greater than it did originally – because every square centimeter of its surface would have 16 times more “red pins” than it did originally.
Only that nothing in the Universe happens by magic. In reality, as a body grows larger, and more and more "red pins" are "stuck" into every square centimeter of its surface, the effectiveness of c2red energies increases – because these "red pins" "stuck" into the surface of a body are these c2red energies, or rather cred energies that are components of c2red energies.
And when the effectiveness of the cred energies increases, the spatial fields encompassed by the body become smaller and smaller – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And when the spatial fields encompassed by the body are smaller, the space around the body is curved in the fourth dimension, or at least mathematically – and I didn't write about this in my first brochure, because I'll write about it in the second one; but in the first brochure I described what this mathematical fourth dimension is.
But when the spatial fields encompassed by the body are smaller, they have a greater "density".
Therefore, the particle that is the building block of this body has a greater mass.
And in this situation, the excess mass of the particle is the measure of the increase in the effectiveness of the cred energies.
For example, when such the particle has the mass twice as large, this excess mass reveals that the effectiveness of the energies cred is KAZIUK * KAZIUK times greater than in the case of a single particle that is not a building block of any body – and what this results from, I described in my brochure.
So:
the force of gravity doesnt depend on the mass of the particles – because the mass of the particle increases with the increase in the force of gravity – only on the number of particles.
I will also add that when a rocket is rushing through space, the space around it is also mathematically curved – because the spatial fields encompassed by the rocket are also smaller; only in this case not because of the increased effectiveness of “red” energy, but because of the action of “pink” energy.
And I will add one more thing:
As I have already mentioned, the movement of a body in space is not the force, so from a purely energetic point of view it has no significance. What does matter is that “pink” energy, just like the increased effectiveness of “red” energy, mathematically curves space. So if the Earth stood still and did not rotate, the apple would hit a certain Newton in the head less strongly, because it would accelerate slower – but I'll tell you what the consequences of all this are in my second brochure.
But I'll add something else:
The curvature of space itself is not the force. The force appears when this mathematical four-dimensionality is squeezed into three-dimensional space, because then the "green" gravitational field is created – but I'll tell you how exactly it works in my second brochure.
And here on TikTok professor of physics Andrzej Dragan, the Polish star of this monkey circus practiced by professors of physics, talks about what professors of physics know about gravity, or rather about the lack of any knowledge about this phenomenon. The video lasts 115 seconds, and everything is clear.
This force "driving into the floor," of which professor of physics Andrzej Dragan has no idea what it is and spins foolish visions of an accelerating pancake as if it were some kind of illusion, are these "red pins" "stuck" into the surface of the body, i.e. cred energies. And the more "red pins" are "stuck" into the same surface area, the stronger such "red hoop", or rather "red sphere", and thus the effect of "driving into the floor" is greater.
"Pink" energy supports this effect of "driving into the floor", because when "pink" energy acts on the body, the spatial fields encompassed by this body are smaller, and thus there are more "red pins" "stuck" into the same surface area of the body, so the "red sphere" surrounding the surface of the body is stronger.
But when the spatial fields encompassed by the body are smaller due to the increased effectiveness of the "red" energy and the action of the "pink" energy and space is mathematically curved in the fourth dimension, the body outside the "red sphere" is surrounded by the "green" gravitational field, whose "green" force is an extension of the force of the "red sphere".
And since a sphere with a radius twice as large has a surface area four times larger, the "green" gravitational field weakens with the square of the distance – i.e. twice as far from the center of the body it is four times weaker. Until finally it reaches a minimum force, and this is its edge – and I'll tell you what this minimum force is in my second brochure.
And once you know what it is all about, then everything is simple and obvious. But I suspect that no naked ape calling himself professor of physics would have come up with this even in 1,000 years.
Here I'll put a few words to professors of physics, so also to the star of the monkey circus Andrzej Dragan:
You think that because you bury your heads in the sand, my ideas, theories and arguments don't exist (not to mention the fact that most of you are simply too stupid to understand their importance). How is that possible? Because you have monkey mind inherited from your monkey ancestors. But I inform you that soon I'll offer 1,000,000 USD for demonstrating the fallacy of Kaziuk's Sequence, and I'll publicize it to the whole world. And of course none of you will be able to do it. And that will be the end of your monkey circus, and you will become a universal laughing stock.
5th Sharp Turn
Light is also "red" energy, only "reversed" – and how exactly it works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
Light moves in a strange way, because it moves AS IF in the fourth dimension – and how exactly it works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
As a result:
1. Photon moving AS IF in the fourth dimension, that's AS IF outside three-dimensional space, has no mass – similarly, a fly flying over a plate of soup doesn't feel the density of the soup.
2. Regardless of whether a body is moving in three-dimensional space or not, photon comes to it and goes away from it at the same speed – similarly, a raindrop falls in the third dimension on your head at the same speed regardless of whether you are standing or running on a two-dimensional and leveled surface of a pitch.
3. When there are two slits in three-dimensional space, a single photon passes through both at once, and if there were more, it would pass through more – similarly, a drop falling from the third dimension onto the surface of the pitch will splash on all sides of the two-dimensional space.
6th Sharp Turn
When the spatial fields encompassed by a body have a greater "density," and this body has a greater mass, then all processes in this body occur more slowly – similarly, a fly in a thicker soup does jumping jacks more slowly.
However, when the spatial fields have a greater "density," then they are correspondingly smaller – but you already know that.
And a body encompassing smaller spatial fields is smaller – and you already know that too.
Therefore, regardless of how fast the body is moving, or how strong the gravitational field is, the processes in this body occur at the same rhythm – similarly, a fly in a thicker soup but smaller does jumping jacks at the same rhythm as a fly in a thinner soup but larger.
And that's why
an astronaut in a flying rocket lives and ages at the same rhythm as his twin remaining on Earth.
And why does an atomic clock in motion, or in a gravitational field, run slower?
It's because radioactive decay, unlike an astronaut, has no size, and when the "density" of spatial fields is greater, radioactive decay simply occurs slower.
And one more thing:
When spatial fields are "denser," the photon has a lower speed – similarly, a fly in a thicker soup swims slower – but then the spatial fields are correspondingly smaller, which is why the effective speed of a photon in a flying rocket is always the same regardless of how fast the rocket is flying.
7th Sharp Turn
The "density" of the spatial field doesn't increase infinitely, but only by a maximum number of times, i.e. KAZIUK times – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
So the mass of the particle can also increase only KAZIUK times.
And that is why
the force of gravity doesn't increase infinitely, but only reaches a maximum value.
And then the "red pins", that's cred energies, "stuck" into the surface of the body are one next to the other without any gaps. And then no "red" photon will get out of there, because it's "driven into the floor" with the force equivalent to its speed. And as a result, such a body is invisible.
And the spatial fields that this invisible body encompasses are maximally reduced, that's KAZIUK times reduced. And then each such spatial field has the size of the field center. And then each field center is c3green energy, or rather c3black energy.
And in such an invisible body, no processes occur – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And such an invisible body is AS IF outside space – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And then the mathematical curvature of the space surrounding this body is maximum – but I'll write about this in my second brochure.
-------------------------------------------------------------
When the "pink" energy pushing the body in space is getting greater and greater, then finally the increase in the body's mass is maximal and the spatial fields that the body encompasses are maximally reduced.
And then
this body is invisible, and it rushes at speed c.
This body is invisible, because its surface also has "red pins" "stuck" one next to the other without any gaps – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And in such an invisible body, no processes occur – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And such an invisible body is AS IF outside space – and how exactly this works and what it results from, I described in my brochure.
And then the mathematical curvature of the space surrounding this body is maximum – but I'll write about this in my second brochure.
I'll also add that when an invisible particle has the speed of c AS IF outside of space, the total "pink" energy pushing it is as follows:
Epink = c3pink – c2
Why exactly it is like that, you'll learn from my brochure.
I'll also add that these descriptions above are only model ones and are intended to show what it is all about. In reality, the increase in the effectivness of “red” energy and the acting of "pink" energy are additive, so in reality it's all more complex.
8th Sharp Turn
Space is expanding because new spatial fields are flowing into it – and how exactly this works, what it comes from and where these spatial fields come from, I'll describe in my second brochure.
And the pace of this influx determines the rhythm of all processes in space.
So the Universe is like a mill in which life is bustling because "the mill wheel turns" thanks to the "flowing river."
And just as you can't enter the same river twice, in the Universe there is neither past nor future, there is only this moment that is just happening.
But although the past no longer exists, you can take a look into it – but that I will discusse in my second brochure.
9th Sharp Turn
The Big Bang had and has nothing to do with the expansion of space.
The Big Bang breathed "life" into space when it was created as a result of the inflow of the first spatial fields, i.e. the first c3green energies – but I'll tell you about that in my second brochure.
In my second brochure I'll also tell you about what was before, and how it'll end, and what will happen next.
But not only that, in my second brochure I'll also tell you about the structure of the ENTIRE Universe, and how small a part of the Universe is what to naked apes calling themselves professors of physics seem to be everything.
At the finish line, or rather at the halfway point
I'll publish my second brochure right after I receive the Nobel Prize in Physics for what I described in the first brochure.
And here is my letter to professors of physics in which I have showed three times that professors of physics have less brains than my she-goat.
Kaziuk von Märchendorf
mail: kaziukvonmaerchendorf@gmail.com
P.S. If you have something to say about my letter, do it on my Facebook page Einstein miał rację (Einstein was right).
(28/02/2025)